PetroStrategies, Inc. 
Topics

bullet

Home

bullet

About Us

bullet

Classes

bullet

Graphs

bullet

Latest Data

bullet

Bloomberg.com

bullet

This Week in Petroleum

bullet

NYMEX Prices

bullet

Crude Oil

bullet

Crude Oil Prices

bullet

US Production

bullet

Top Oil Producers

bullet

Crude Oil Stocks

bullet

Supply & Demand

bullet

Wells & Prices

bullet

Drilling Costs

bullet

Natural Gas

bullet

Demand

bullet

Future & Spot Prices

bullet

Price Comparison

bullet

Production

bullet

Storage

bullet

Supply & Demand

bullet

Wells & Prices

bullet

Drilling Costs

bullet

Exploration

bullet

Rig Count

bullet

Rig Count Forecast

bullet

Seismic Crews

bullet

Success Rates

bullet

Wells Drilled

bullet

Drilling Costs

bullet

Production

bullet

Crude Oil Production

bullet

Top Oil Producers

bullet

Natural Gas Production

bullet

Drilling Costs

bullet

Transportation

bullet

Refining

bullet

Cracking Margins

bullet

Refinery Yields

bullet

Distillate Production

bullet

Gasoline Production

bullet

GC Product Prices

bullet

Stocks

bullet

Utilization

bullet

Seasonality

bullet

Marketing

bullet

Motor Vehicle MPG

bullet

Gasoline Pump Prices

bullet

Crude & Gasoline Prices

bullet

Learning Center

bullet

Links



PetroStrategies, Inc.
PO Box 260415
Plano, Texas 75026-0415
Email

Web Site

Home | Contact | Feedback | Search | Site Map

U.S. Rig Count Forecast



The rig count forecast is based on a correlation developed by PetroStrategies, Inc.  We revised our regression to include future prices for natural gas. The regression used is:

Rig Count = 594.43 + 12.682*West Texas Intermediate Crude Price lagged 8-months + 34.542*Natural Gas Futures price lagged 8-months.

The equation explains 85.8% of the variance in rig count with a standard error of the estimate equal to ±134. 

We have developed a new forecast that includes the current rig count.

Rig Count = 0.7645*US Rig Count lagged 8 months + 3.0108*West Texas Intermediate Crude Price lagged 8-months + 39.8771*Natural Gas Futures price lagged 8-months.

The equation explains 98.9% of the variance in rig count with a standard error of the estimate equal to ±145. 

The standard error increased due to the greater differences in the more recent data.

The forecasts since September 2008 have been much higher than the actual rig count.  We believe that this is due to three reasons.  One, the oil and gas price projections used in planning drilling programs were much lower than the market values.  This is a reflection of skepticism and conservatism by industry executives.  Two, the availability and cost of drilling rigs also had a negative influence on rig activity.  The third factor is that drilling activity has declined faster than expected and reflects pessimism in the recovery of the world economy and OPEC's ability to control oil prices.  Our correlations have used a lag time of 8-months and recent drilling activity reflects a lag time of 4-months.


As with any forecast, readers are advised to use this information with care.  PetroStrategies is not liable for any damages as a result of incorrect forecasts and decisions made based on these forecasts.
We welcome readers' comments and suggestions on this regression. 

Source: Baker Hughes Inc. as published in the Oil & Gas Journal Statistics

Additional information is available from Oil & Gas Journal's electronic information source OGJ Online.


Copyright 2000
PetroStrategies, Inc.
All Rights Reserved